And Then There Were None – High Finance Finagling Takes Down the Top 5 Investment Banks

0

Founded in , the collapse of this Wall Street icon shook the world of high1923finance. JP Morgan Chase purchased Bear Stearns for a price of $10 per distribute, a stark contrast tohighits 52 week of $133.20 per distribute. Actually, By the end of May, the endSternsof Bear was complete. The first of the top 5 investment banks to fall was Bear Sterns, in March of 2008. In factSeptemberThen, came , . Interestingly, Wall Street, and the world, watched declared, in just a handful of days, the remaining investment banks on the top 5 list tumbled and the investment banking system was while broken.

Investment as a matter of fact BasicsBank

The largest of the investment banks are big players in the realm of high finance, helping big business and government raise money through such means as dealing in securities in both the equity and bond markets, as well as by offering expert guidance on the more complex aspects of high finance. As you may know, Among these are such things as acquisitions and mergers. Investment banks also handle commodities trading of a variety of financial investment vehicles, including derivatives and the.

This as a matter of fact type of bank also has involvement in mutual funds, hedge funds, and pension funds, which is one of the main ways in which what happens in the world of high finance is felt by the average consumer. The dramatic falling of the remaining top investment banks affected retirement plans and investments not just in the United States, but also throughout the world.

The High Finance Finagling That Brought Them Down

In an article titled “Too Clever By Half”, published on September 22, 2008, by Forbes.com, the Chemical Bank chairman’s professor of economics at Princeton University and writer Burton G. Malkiel provides an excellent and straightforward to follow breakdown of what exactly happened. While the catalyst for the current crisis was the mortgage and breaking meltdown and the bursting of the housing bubble, the roots of it lie in what Malkiel calls the lending of the bond between lenders and borrowers.

Naturally, since they held onto the debt and its associated uncertainty, banks and other lenders were fairly careful about the excellence of their loans and weighed the probability of repayment or default by the borrower carefully, against standards that made sense. What he is referring to is the shift from the banking era in which a loan or mortgage was made by a bank or lender and held by that bank or lender. Banks and lenders moved away from that model, towards what Malkiel calls an “originate and distribute” model.

Indeed, Instead of holding mortgages and loans, “mortgage originators (including non-bank ) would hold loans only until they could be packaged into a set of complex mortgage-backed securities, broken up into different segments or tranches having different priorities in the rightinstitutionsto receive payments from the underlying mortgages,” with the same model also being applied other types of lending, such as to credit card debt and car loans.

Actually, As these debt-backed assets were sold and in investment world, they became increasingly leveraged, with debt to equity ratiostradedfrequently reaching as high as 30-to-1. This wheeling and dealing often took as it turns out aplace in shady and unregulated system that came to be called the shadow banking system. Actually, As the degree of leverage increased, so too did the threat.

With all the currency to be made in the shadow banking system, lenders became less choosy about who they gave loans to, as they were no longer holding the loans or the threat, but rather slicing and dicing them, repackaging them and more than ever selling them off at a profit. Exorbitant exotic loans became popular and lenders trolled the depths of the sub-prime field for still more loans to make. Indeed, Crazy terms became popular, no cash down, no docs required, and the like.

Finally, the system grinded almost to a halt with the fall of housing prices and increased loan defaults and foreclosures, with lenders making short clause loans to as a matter of fact other lenders being afraid of making loans to such increasingly leveraged and illiquid entities. The decreased confidence could be seen in the dropping share prices asthe last of the top investment banks drowned in shaky debt and investor fear.

September saw Lehman Brothers fail, Merrill Lynch pick takeover over collapse, and Goldman Sacs and Morgan Stanley retreatonto the status of bank holding companies, with potential buyouts the horizon. Some of these year banks dated return nearly a century, and others longer, such as the 158-investment former Lehman more than ever Brothers. Quite an inglorious end may these historic giants of finance, destroyed by a system of high finance finagling and shady dealings, a system that, as it falls apart, for even end up dragging down the economy of the entire world.

Leave a Reply